The Nielsen Company (US), LLC v. Hyphametrics, Inc.
| The Nielsen Company (US), LLC |
| HyphaMetrics, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01591 |
| November 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by HyphaMetrics, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/21/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by HyphaMetrics, Inc.. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Richard G. Frenkel, Gabriel K. Bell, Gregory K. Sobolski, and Diane E. Ghrist - filed by HyphaMetrics, Inc.. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Richard G. Frenkel, Gabriel K. Bell, Gregory K. Sobolski, and Diane E. Ghrist filed by HyphaMetrics, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 1/7/22. (ntl)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 7, 2022 filed by The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 11/22/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 7, 2022 - filed by The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. (Palapura, Bindu)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Clifford E. Katz, Steven Yovits, Constantine Koutsoubas, Malavika Rao, and Mark J. Scott for The Nielsen Company (US), LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Steven Yovits, Constantine Koutsoubas, Mark J. Scott, Clifford Katz and Malavika Rao of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP filed by The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 11/18/21. (ntl)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01591-UNA, 1:21-cv-01592-UNA(nms)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Steven Yovits, Constantine Koutsoubas, Mark J. Scott, Clifford Katz and Malavika Rao of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP - filed by The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. (Palapura, Bindu)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. HyphaMetrics, Inc. served on 11/11/2021, answer due 12/2/2021. (Moore, David)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to HyphaMetrics, Inc. on 11/10/2021. (smg)
|
|
Filing 4
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Other Affiliate Nielsen Holdings PLC for The Nielsen Company (US), LLC filed by The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. (smg)
|
|
Filing 3
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,924,994 B2. (smg)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (smg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against HyphaMetrics, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3740516.) - filed by The Nielsen Company (US), LLC.(smg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/10/2021: #1 Exhibit A-F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (smg).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
