Hines v. Ted et al
Kevin L. Hines |
Ted, Vinnie, Charlene and Gaudenzia Rehabilitation Facility |
1:2022cv00193 |
February 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Vacant Judgeship (2022) |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Reassigned to Vacant Judgeship (2022). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (nmg) |
Filing 5 Second Letter MOTION requesting the Court to subpoena surveillance video footage of an incident at Gaudenzia Rehabilitation Facility from April 1st to May 14th 2021 - filed by Kevin L. Hines. (twk) |
Filing 4 Letter MOTION asking the Court to subpoena surveillance video footage of an incident at Gaudenzia Rehabilitation Facility from April 1st to May 14th 2021 - filed by Kevin L. Hines. (mal) |
Filing 3 Proposed Deposition Questions Directed Towards Ted, Charlene, and Vinnie filed by Kevin L. Hines (apk) |
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (smg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed pursuant to 42:1983 with Jury Demand against Charlene, Gaudenzia Rehabilitation Facility, Ted, Vinnie ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number DEX037056.) - filed by Kevin L. Hines. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(smg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.