Swirlate IP LLC v. Quantela, Inc.
Swirlate IP LLC |
Quantela, Inc. |
1:2022cv00235 |
February 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 22, 2022 - filed by Quantela, Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 22, 2022, filed by Quantela, Inc. Reset Answer Deadlines: Quantela, Inc. answer due 5/22/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/22/2022. (kmd) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Swirlate IP LLC. Quantela, Inc. served on 3/2/2022, answer due 3/23/2022. (Chong, Jimmy) |
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett, filed by Swirlate IP LLC.Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/7/2022. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00234-CFC, 1:22-cv-00235-CFC, 1:22-cv-00237-CFC, 1:22-cv-00249-CFC(kmd) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney David R. Bennett for Swirlate IP LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00234-CFC, 1:22-cv-00235-CFC, 1:22-cv-00237-CFC, 1:22-cv-00249-CFC(srs) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett - filed by Swirlate IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Chong, Jimmy) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00234-CFC, 1:22-cv-00235-CFC, 1:22-cv-00237-CFC, 1:22-cv-00249-CFC (rjb) |
Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (srs) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Swirlate IP LLC. (srs) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,154,961 ;7,567,622. (srs) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Quantela, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3810483.) - filed by Swirlate IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Related Cases)(srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Swirlate IP LLC v. Quantela, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Swirlate IP LLC | |
Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Quantela, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jeremy Douglas Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.