The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc. v. Treadstone 71, LLC et al
| The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc. doing business as SANS Institute |
| Treadstone 71, LLC and Jeffrey Bardin |
| 1:2022cv00871 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Copyright |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 REPLY BRIEF to #11 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Jeffrey Bardin, Treadstone 71, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Moore, Aaron) Modified on 9/21/2022 (nms). |
| Filing 18 REDACTED VERSION of #15 Declaration of Amanda L. Kutz, by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. (Blaszkowski, Christopher) Modified on 9/20/2022 (nms). |
| Filing 17 REDACTED VERSION of #13 Answering Brief in Opposition, by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. (Blaszkowski, Christopher) Modified on 9/20/2022 (nms). |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of Robert M. Lee re #13 Answering Brief, by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. (Blaszkowski, Christopher) Modified on 9/15/2022 (nms). |
| Filing 15 [SEALED] DECLARATION of Amanda L. Kutz re #13 Answering Brief, by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Blaszkowski, Christopher) Modified on 9/15/2022 (nms). |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Christopher H. Blaszkowski re #13 Answering Brief in Opposition, by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. (Blaszkowski, Christopher) Modified on 9/15/2022 (nms). |
| Filing 13 [SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue filed by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 9/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Blaszkowski, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, filed by Jeffrey Bardin, Treadstone 71, LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 9/14/2022. (Moore, Aaron) Modified on 8/31/2022 (nms). |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue - filed by Jeffrey Bardin, Treadstone 71, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(Moore, Aaron) Modified on 8/31/2022 (nms). |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David J. Shannon - filed by Jeffrey Bardin, Treadstone 71, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Attorney Certification)(Moore, Aaron) |
SO ORDERED, re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David J. Shannon, filed by Treadstone 71, LLC, Jeffrey Bardin. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/25/2022. (nms)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint to August 31, 2022 - filed by Jeffrey Bardin, Treadstone 71, LLC. (Moore, Aaron) Modified on 8/24/2022 (nms). |
| Filing 8 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Jeffrey Bardin, Treadstone 71, LLC. (Moore, Aaron) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron E. Moore on behalf of Jeffrey Bardin, Treadstone 71, LLC (Moore, Aaron) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Wm. Jackson Matney for The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint(*Reset Answer Deadlines: Jeffrey Bardin answer due 8/31/2022; Treadstone 71, LLC answer due 8/31/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/24/2022. (nms)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Wm. Jackson Matney, Jr., filed by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/17/2022. (nms)
|
| CORRECTING ENTRY: The pdf for D.I. #6 has been replaced with a corrected version. The address for local counsel has been modified and the case caption has been corrected. (nms) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Wm. Jackson Matney, Jr. - filed by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. (Blaszkowski, Christopher) (Main Document 6 replaced on 8/17/2022) (nms). |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Treadstone 71, LLC on July 27, 2022, filed by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. (Blaszkowski, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. Jeffrey Bardin served on 7/19/2022, answer due 8/9/2022. (Blaszkowski, Christopher) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. (twk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Jeffrey Bardin, Treadstone 71, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3905851.) - filed by The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk) |
| No Summons Issued. (twk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
