Optinvest, Ltd. v. Magna Electronics, Inc.
| Optinvest, Ltd. |
| Magna Electronics, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv01327 |
| October 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Magna International Inc. for Magna Electronics, Inc. filed by Magna Electronics, Inc.. (Yoch, James) |
| Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Magna Electronics, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 12/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A & B, #2 Certificate of Compliance)(Yoch, James) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Magna Electronics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Yoch, James) |
SO ORDERED re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John J. Kuster, Alex R. Rovira, Andres Barajas filed by Magna Electronics, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/3/2022. (etg)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John J. Kuster, Alex R. Rovira, Andres Barajas - filed by Magna Electronics, Inc.. (Yoch, James) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer complaint to December 8, 2022 filed by Magna Electronics, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/2/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer complaint to December 8, 2022 - filed by Magna Electronics, Inc.. (Yoch, James) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Optinvest, Ltd..Magna Electronics, Inc. served on 10/11/2022, answer due 11/1/2022. (Stuhlman, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Optinvest, Ltd.. (mpb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Magna Electronics, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3978436.) - filed by Optinvest, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) |
| No Summons Issued. (mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Optinvest, Ltd. v. Magna Electronics, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Optinvest, Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Benedict Cicero |
| Represented By: | Gregory Erich Stuhlman |
| Represented By: | Thomas Andrew Youngman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Magna Electronics, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | James M. Yoch, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
