Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc.
| Akamai Technologies, Inc. |
| Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc. doing business as Equilibrium |
| 1:2022cv01531 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Order Setting Rule 16(b) Telephone Conference: A Scheduling Conference is set for 2/3/2023, at 11:00 AM (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/20/2023. (nms)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Steven Callahan and Christopher T. Bovenkamp of Charhon Callahan Robson & Garza, PLLC - filed by Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc.. (Moore, David) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Steven Callahan and Christopher T. Bovenkamp of Charhon Callahan Robson & Garza, PLLC, filed by Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/17/2023. (nms)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jason R. Bartlett, Jason A. Crotty, and Mark J. Pernick of Mauriel Kapouytian Woods LLP - filed by Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc.. (Moore, David) |
| Filing 10 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc.. (Moore, David) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc..(Moore, David) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jason R. Bartlett, Jason A. Crotty, and Mark J. Pernick of Mauriel Kapouytian Woods LLP, filed by Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/13/2023. (nms)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint - filed by Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc.. (Moore, David) Modified on 12/13/2022 (nms). |
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc. answer due 1/13/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/13/2022. (nms)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney James R. Batchelder, Daniel W. Richards, and James L. Davis, Jr for Akamai Technologies, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James R. Batchelder, James L. Davis, Jr., and Daniel W. Richards - filed by Akamai Technologies, Inc.. (Vrana, Robert) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James R. Batchelder, James L. Davis, Jr., and Daniel W. Richards, filed by Akamai Technologies, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/2/2022. (nms)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Akamai Technologies, Inc..Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc. served on 11/23/2022, answer due 12/14/2022. (Vrana, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc. on 11/23/2022. (srs) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Akamai Technologies, Inc.. (srs) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,543,667 B2. (srs) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4011653.) - filed by Akamai Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Akamai Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Robert M. Vrana |
| Represented By: | Adam Wyatt Poff |
| Represented By: | Alexis Stombaugh |
| Represented By: | Daniel W. Richards |
| Represented By: | James R. Batchelder |
| Represented By: | James L. Davis, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc. doing business as Equilibrium | |
| Represented By: | David Ellis Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
