In Re: Zuru LLC et al
| Zuru LLC and Zuru Inc. |
| A&E Television Networks, LLC, Fox Corporation, Lions Gate Entertainment Inc., Mandate Pictures, LLC, NBCUniversal Media, LLC, Studio Distribution Services LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Walden Media, LLC and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. |
| 1:2022mc00303 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 REVISED Application for the Issuance of Subpoenas Ad Testificandum and Subpoenas Duces Tecum Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 24. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/16/2022. (nmf)
|
| CASE CLOSED per D.I. #6 . (nmf) |
| Remark: Certified subpoenas have been issued by the Deputy Clerk in accordance with the Court's Order of 8/16/2022 (D.I. #6 ). The subpoenas are available for pickup in the Clerk Office during normal business hours. (nmf) |
| Filing 5 Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Aaron M. Nelson regarding Courtesy Copies of Petitioners' Revised Application for Issuance of Subpoenas - re #4 Amended Document,,,,,,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Redline of original Schedule A's))(Nelson, Aaron) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Zuru Inc., Zuru LLC. Amendment to #1 REVISED Application for the Issuance of Subpoenas Ad Testificandum and Subpoenas Duces Tecum Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 24. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - A&E Television Networks, LLC Subpoena Duces Tecum, #2 Exhibit B - A&E Television Networks, LLC Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #3 Exhibit C - Fox Corporation Subpoena Duces Tecum, #4 Exhibit D - Fox Corporation Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #5 Exhibit E - Lions Gate Entertainment, Inc. Subpoena Duces Tecum, #6 Exhibit F - Lions Gate Entertainment, Inc. Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #7 Exhibit G - Mandate Pictures, LLC Subpoena Duces Tecum, #8 Exhibit H - Mandate Pictures, LLC Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #9 Exhibit I - NBCUniversal Media, LLC Subpoena Duces Tecum, #10 Exhibit J - NBCUniversal Media, LLC Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #11 Exhibit K - Studio Distribution Services LLC - Subpoena Duces Tecum, #12 Exhibit L - Studio Distribution Services LLC - Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #13 Exhibit M - The Walt Disney Company Subpoena Duces Tecum, #14 Exhibit N - The Walt Disney Company Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #15 Exhibit O - Walden Media, LLC Subpoena Duces Tecum, #16 Exhibit P - Walden Media, LLC Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #17 Exhibit Q - Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. Subpoena Duces Tecum, #18 Exhibit R - Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Nelson, Aaron) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Colm F. Connolly - In-Person Status Conference held on 8/9/2022. (Court Reporter Bonnie Archer.) Counsel shall re-file as discussed during the conference. (nmf) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Damian K. Gunningsmith of Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP, on behalf of Petitioners Zuru LLC and Zuru Inc - filed by Zuru Inc., Zuru LLC. (Nelson, Aaron) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Damian K. Gunningsmith of Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP, on behalf of Petitioners Zuru LLC and Zuru Inc., filed by Zuru Inc., Zuru LLC. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/4/2022. (kmd)
|
|
ORAL ORDER Setting Hearing: An in-person Status Conference is set for 8/9/2022 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/4/2022. (kmd)
|
| Filing 2 Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Aaron M. Nelson, Esq regarding Courtesy Copies of Petitioners' Application for Issuance of Subpoenas - re #1 . (Nelson, Aaron) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Remark: Case Submitted for Routine Judicial Assignment. (apk) |
| Filing 1 Application for the Issuance of Subpoenas Ad Testificandum and Subpoenas Duces Tecum Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 24 by Zuru Inc., Zuru LLC (Miscellaneous Filing Fee Paid ADEDC-3916420) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - A&E Television Networks, LLC Subpoena Duces Tecum, #2 Exhibit B - A&E Television Networks, LLC Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #3 Exhibit C - Fox Corporation Subpoena Duces Tecum, #4 Exhibit D - Fox Corporation Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #5 Exhibit E - Lions Gate Entertainment, Inc. Subpoena Duces Tecum, #6 Exhibit F - Lions Gate Entertainment, Inc. Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #7 Exhibit G - Mandate Pictures, LLC Subpoena Duces Tecum, #8 Exhibit H - Mandate Pictures, LLC Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #9 Exhibit I - NBCUniversal Media, LLC Subpoena Duces Tecum, #10 Exhibit J - NBCUniversal Media, LLC Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #11 Exhibit K - Studio Distribution Services LLC - Subpoena Duces Tecum, #12 Exhibit L - Studio Distribution Services LLC - Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #13 Exhibit M - The Walt Disney Company Subpoena Duces Tecum, #14 Exhibit N - The Walt Disney Company Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #15 Exhibit O - Walden Media, LLC Subpoena Duces Tecum, #16 Exhibit P - Walden Media, LLC Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #17 Exhibit Q - Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. Subpoena Duces Tecum, #18 Exhibit R - Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. Subpoena Ad Testificandum, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Text of Proposed Order)(apk) Modified on 7/18/2022 (smg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
