Jain v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Amit Jain |
Scottsdale Insurance Company |
1:2024cv01361 |
December 12, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 REQUEST for Oral Argument by Scottsdale Insurance Company re #8 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of Delaware. (Katzenstein, Robert) |
Filing 15 REPLY BRIEF re #8 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of Delaware filed by Amit Jain. (Wasson, Jennifer) |
Filing 14 DECLARATION of Emil Soskin re #13 Memorandum in Opposition by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Katzenstein, Robert) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of Delaware filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/3/2025. (Katzenstein, Robert) |
![]() |
Filing 11 STIPULATION and Proposed Order for Further Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (O'Dell, Julie) Modified on 1/15/2025 (nms). |
Filing 10 DECLARATION of Alexander M. Sugzda re #8 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of Delaware, by Amit Jain. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Wasson, Jennifer) Modified on 1/13/2025 (nms). |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of Delaware, filed by Amit Jain. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/27/2025. (Wasson, Jennifer) Modified on 1/13/2025 (nms). |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of Delaware - filed by Amit Jain. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wasson, Jennifer) Modified on 1/13/2025 (nms). |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Evan F. Jaffe,Alexander M. Sugzda for Amit Jain added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (scs) |
Filing 7 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Alexander M. Sugzda and Evan F. Jaffe. ( re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alexander M. Sugzda and Evan F. Jaffe )( Payment of $ 100, receipt number ADEDC-4581486).(Dang, Malisa) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alexander M. Sugzda and Evan F. Jaffe - filed by Amit Jain. (Dang, Malisa) |
Filing 5 Joint Statement Identifying Pending Matters Pursuant to Rule 81.2, by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Katzenstein, Robert) Modified on 1/2/2025 (nms). |
![]() |
![]() |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION and Proposed Order for Extension of Time - filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Katzenstein, Robert) Modified on 12/18/2024 (nms). |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Parent Corporate Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company for Scottsdale Insurance Company filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (mrr) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mrr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL and copies of documents from Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Case Number N24C-11-022 (PAW) CCLD (Filing fee $405, receipt number ADEDC-4568882)- filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mrr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.