MWANI, et al v. UNITED STATES, et al
| 1:1999cv00125 |
| January 15, 1999 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Proposed judgment and accompanying documents due by 5/11/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey on 4/20/22. (MFB)
|
|
Filing
146
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey on 12/7/21. (MFB)
|
|
Filing
128
SECOND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 11/18/14. (SP, )
|
|
Filing
121
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 9/25/14. (SP, )
|
|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 8/22/14. (SP, )
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 5/29/13. (lcjmf1, )
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 1/10/12. (lcjmf1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MWANI, et al v. UNITED STATES, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
