JUERGENS v. URBAN TITLE SERVICES, LLC et al
| 1:2006cv01524 |
| August 29, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
280
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 27, 2011. (lcckk3)
|
|
Filing
276
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 21, 2011. (lcckk3)
|
|
Filing
274
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 18, 2011. (lcckk3)
|
|
Filing
263
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on April 7, 2010. (lcckk2 )
|
|
Filing
249
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on February 12, 2010. (lcckk2 )
|
|
Filing
241
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on September 17, 2009. (lcckk2 )
|
|
Filing
239
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on September 14, 2009. (lcckk2 )
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on February 4, 2008. (lcckk2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JUERGENS v. URBAN TITLE SERVICES, LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
