COVAD COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY v. REVONET INC
Case Number: 1:2006cv01892
Filed: November 6, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
Presiding Judge: Alan Kay
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 214 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on April 3, 2014. (lcckk1)
April 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 177 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 04/21/2010. (lcjmf1)
March 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 171 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 170 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 03/31/2010. (lcjmf1)
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 122 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 8/25/09. (lcjmf1)
August 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 117 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 103 . Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 8/17/09. (lcjmf1)
May 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 97 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 5/29/09. (lcjmf1)
May 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 95 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 94 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 5/27/09. (lcjmf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COVAD COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY v. REVONET INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?