LATHAM & WATKINS LLP v. EVERSON

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP |
MARK W. EVERSON |
1:2007cv00642 |
April 6, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
![]() SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 8/27/07. (lcjf1, )
|
Filing
13
NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Morris Jacobs on behalf of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP (Jacobs, Kevin)
|
![]() ORDER re referral to Judge Facciola for all purposes including trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 7/12/07. (SP, )
|
![]() ORDER. Pursuant to the 10 Joint Statement of Parties, filed July 3, 2007, this case has been referred to Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola for all purposes, including trial, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 73.1. The parties are to promptly contact Magistrate Judge Facciola's chambers to schedule further proceedings and, at the first meeting with Magistrate Judge Facciola, are to complete a standard consent form agreeing to appear before a Magistrate Judge for all purposes that will be submitted to this Court for approval. Furthermore, the Initial Scheduling Conference previously scheduled before this Court on July 10, 2007 at 9:00 a.m., is vacated. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on July 5, 2007. (lcckk2)
|
Filing
10
MEET AND CONFER STATEMENT. (Seabrook, Susan)
|
![]() SCHEDULING ORDER:Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/10/2007 09:00 AM in Courtroom 28A before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 6/14/07. (dot, )
|
Filing
8
ANSWER to Complaint by MARK W. EVERSON. Related document: 1 Complaint filed by LATHAM & WATKINS LLP.(LoCurto, John)
|
Filing
6
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the US Attorney. MARK W. EVERSON served on 4/6/2007, answer due 6/5/2007 (nmw, )
|
Filing
3
ENTERED IN ERROR.....SUMMONS Returned Executed by LATHAM & WATKINS LLP. MARK W. EVERSON served on 4/6/2007, answer due 6/5/2007., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the US Attorney. MARK W. EVERSON served on 4/6/2007, answer due 6/5/2007, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on Attorney General. Date of Service Upon Attorney General 4/6/07. (Seabrook, Susan) Modified on 5/1/2007 (nmw, ).
|
![]() ORDER Establishing Procedures for Electronic Filing for Cases Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, signed by Judge Kollar-Kotelly on April 12, 2007. (SM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LATHAM & WATKINS LLP v. EVERSON | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: LATHAM & WATKINS LLP | |
Represented By: | Susan E. Seabrook |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MARK W. EVERSON | |
Represented By: | John J. LoCurto, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.