UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE 2006 CHEVROLET CORVETTE AUTOMOBILE, VIN NUMBER 1G1YY26E765131280
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| ONE 2006 CHEVROLET CORVETTE AUTOMOBILE, VIN NUMBER 1G1YY26E765131280 |
| 1:2008cv00989 |
| June 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property Office |
| 11001 |
| James Robertson |
| Defendant |
| U.S. Government Plaintiff |
| 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE 2006 CHEVROLET CORVETTE AUTOMOBILE, VIN NUMBER 1G1YY26E765131280 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Barry Wiegand |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ONE 2006 CHEVROLET CORVETTE AUTOMOBILE, VIN NUMBER 1G1YY26E765131280 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
