GORDON v. CHENEY
Plaintiff: ROBERT ASA GORDON
Defendant: RICHARD B. CHENEY
Case Number: 1:2008cv01294
Filed: July 28, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Voting Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Henry H. Kennedy
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 9 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and denying as moot 3 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and PreliminaryInjunction, 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Present Oral Argument for Summary Judgment, and 19 Plaintiff's Augmented Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. on March 26, 2009. (NP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GORDON v. CHENEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT ASA GORDON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD B. CHENEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?