EDWARDS v. GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al
Plaintiff: ERSALINE EDWARDS
Defendant: GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and THE UNKNOWN AUTHORIZED MEDICAL PERSONNELS
Case Number: 1:2009cv00017
Filed: January 7, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1346 Tort Claim
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EDWARDS v. GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERSALINE EDWARDS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE UNKNOWN AUTHORIZED MEDICAL PERSONNELS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?