NORTHEAST HOSPITAL CORPORATION v. JOHNSON
Plaintiff: NORTHEAST HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Defendant: CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Case Number: 1:2009cv00180
Filed: January 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Contract: Recovery Medicare Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: John D. Bates
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 3/30/2010. (lcjdb1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NORTHEAST HOSPITAL CORPORATION v. JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NORTHEAST HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Represented By: Christopher L. Keough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?