BRODIE v. WORTHINGTON et al
| KHARII W. BRODIE |
| KATHERINE WORTHINGTON, JONATHAN ROSEN, ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, MERRICK B. GARLAND, JANICE ROGERS BROWN, DAVID B. SENTELLE, DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG, ARTHUR RAYMOND RANDOLPH, DAVID S. TATEL, THOMAS B. GRIFFITH, BRETT M. KAVANAUGH, ALBERTO GONZALES, HARLEY LAPPIN, JOHN DOE(S), BRUCE JOHNSON and BRENT JACKSON |
| 1:2009cv01828 |
| September 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Henry H. Kennedy |
| Deborah A. Robinson |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM OPINION dismissing the case in its entirety. Signed by Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein on January 24, 2012. (lchhk1)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting without prejudice 73 Motion to Dismiss of defendant Brent Jackson, denying as moot 62 Motion to Quash Service, and denying 78 Motion for Sanctions of plaintiff Kharii Brodie. Signed by Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. on September 21, 2011. (lchhk1)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER granting 33 Motion to Dismiss of Janice Rogers Brown, Merrick B. Garland, Douglas H. Ginsburg, Thomas B. Griffith, Karen LeCraft Henderson, Ellen Segal Huvelle, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Arthur Raymond Randolph, David B. Sentelle, and David S. Tatel. Signed by Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. on August 31, 2011. (lchhk1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
