CHIN v. PALCHAK et al
WEI CHIN |
TIMOTHY PALCHAK, JONATHAN K. ANDREWS, OPHER SHWEIKI, GEORGE ALLEN DALE and MICHAEL L. HENDRICKS |
1:2010cv00606 |
April 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
88888 |
Unassigned |
Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDERED that this civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 8/18/2011. (ls, ) |
Filing 13 MANDATE of USCA (certified copy) as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by WEI CHIN ; ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the case be remanded for reconsideration of the sua sponte dismissal of appellant's complaint in light of the arguments raised in the parties appellate submissions and for consideration of appellant's request to amend his civil action, contained in his reply brief and the supplement thereto. USCA Case Number 10-5145. (mmh) |
Leave to File Request for Change of Venue and Consideration on the other issues Denied by Judge Leon on 6/21/2011(ls, ) |
Filing 12 Supplemental Record on Appeal transmitted to US Court of Appeals re #11 Order on Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis ;USCA Case Number 10-5145. (ls, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 6/14/2010. (ls, ) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by WEI CHIN. (kb) |
Filing 9 ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by WEI CHIN ; USCA Case Number 10-5145. Upon consideration of the motion to appeal in forma pauperis, which was received from appellant, it is, on the court's own motion, ORDERED that the motion to appeal in forma pauperis be referred to the district court for resolution in the first instance. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case be held in abeyance pending further order of the court. (kb) |
USCA Case Number 10-5145 for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by WEI CHIN. (mmh, ) |
Filing 8 Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The Fee was not paid because it was filed In Forma Pauperis re #7 Notice of Appeal. (mmh, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case by WEI CHIN. Filing fee $ 0.00. Fee Status: No fee paid. Parties have been notified. (mmh, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER that plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, which the Court construes as one under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on 5/4/2010. (kb) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Alter or Amend Judgment by WEI CHIN. (kb) |
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application to proceed without prepayment of fees is GRANTED. This is a final appealable order. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 04/13/10. (tb, ) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 04/13/10. (tb, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by WEI CHIN. (tb, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/27/2010) (ls, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JONATHAN K. ANDREWS, GEORGE ALLEN DALE, MICHAEL L. HENDRICKS, TIMOTHY PALCHAK, OPHER SHWEIKI (Filing fee $ 0) filed by WEI CHIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(tb, ) (Attachment 4 replaced on 9/27/2010) (ls, ). |
SUMMONS Not Issued as to JONATHAN K. ANDREWS, GEORGE ALLEN DALE, MICHAEL L. HENDRICKS, TIMOTHY PALCHAK, OPHER SHWEIKI (tb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.