IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE ON THE ARTICLES AGAINST JUDGE THOMAS G. PORTEOUS, JR. v. AMATO
Petitioner:
IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE ON THE ARTICLES AGAINST JUDGE THOMAS G. PORTEOUS, JR.
Respondent:
JACOB J. AMATO, JR.
Case Number:
1:2010mc00443
Filed:
July 23, 2010
Court:
District Of Columbia District Court
Office:
Washington, DC Office
County:
11001
Presiding Judge:
Paul L. Friedman
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:
MS:MiscOrd
Jury Demanded By:
None
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE ON THE ARTICLES AGAINST JUDGE THOMAS G. PORTEOUS, JR. v. AMATO | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: IMPEACHMENT TRIAL COMMITTEE ON THE ARTICLES AGAINST JUDGE THOMAS G. PORTEOUS, JR. | |
| Represented By: | Morgan John Frankel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JACOB J. AMATO, JR. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
