BARTLETT v. OVERSLAUGH

Plaintiff: JOEL BARTLETT
Defendant: GORDON OVERSLAUGH
Case Number: 1:2012cv01306
Filed: August 7, 2012
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 11, 2016 108 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff Bartlett's 101 Motion to Dismiss defendant Suite Services, Inc's counterclaim is GRANTED, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Suite Services, Inc.'s 97 counterclaim is DISMISSED. See Order for complete details. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 3/11/2016. (lcabj3)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARTLETT v. OVERSLAUGH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOEL BARTLETT
Represented By: Ellis L. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GORDON OVERSLAUGH
Represented By: Christopher M. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?