INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC et al v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LTD et al
| INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and IPR LICENSING, INC. |
| HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, LTD., FUTURE WEI TECHNOLOGIES INC, NOKIA CORPORATION, NOKIA INC., ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC., LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC. and LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC. |
| 1:2012mc00018 |
| January 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Royce C. Lamberth |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Application for Letters Rogatory |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, IPR LICENSING INC identifying Corporate Parent InterDigital Communication LLC, InterDigital Technology Corporation, and IPR Licensing Inc for INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, IPR LICENSING INC. (ls, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Request by INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, IPR LICENSING INC (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1) (Fee paid $46.00, Receipt No. 4616045225).(ls, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
