MORRIS v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA

Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE MORRIS
Defendant: CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Case Number: 1:2013cv00121
Filed: January 29, 2013
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Referring Judge: Deborah A. Robinson
Presiding Judge: Robert L. Wilkins
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 17, 2014 36 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION re 21 Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 12/17/2014. (lccrc1, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MORRIS v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE MORRIS
Represented By: Geoffrey D. Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Represented By: Timothy J. Bojanowski
Represented By: Mariana del Valle Bravo
Represented By: Joseph E. Hainline
Represented By: Daniel P. Struck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.