SAVAGE v. DISTRICTOF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
TONY SAVAGE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number:
1:2013cv00312
Filed:
March 11, 2013
Court:
District Of Columbia District Court
Office:
Washington, DC Office
County:
88888
Presiding Judge:
Richard J. Leon
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:
28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SAVAGE v. DISTRICTOF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TONY SAVAGE | |
Represented By: | Clarence Angelo Connelly, Jr. |
Represented By: | Carl Lowell Crews |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
Represented By: | Alex Karpinski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.