OWENS-HART v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY et al
| WINIFRED OWENS-HART |
| HOWARD UNIVERSITY and ANTHONY M. MCEACHERN |
| 1:2014cv00758 |
| April 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Beryl A. Howell |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. See attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 12/06/2016. (lcapm1)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 35 Defendant's Motion to Compel Expert Discovery and Expert Disclosure. It is further ordered that, to the extent Plaintiff has not yet produced any of her medical records from Dr. Hales, she shall obtain and produce them promptly and, in no event, later than April 25, 2016. See attached Order for further details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 03/29/2016. (lcapm1)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 31 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Deposition Questions. See attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 02/04/2016. (lcapm1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
