SALINI COSTRUTTORI S.P.A. v. KINGDOM OF MOROCCO
Petitioner: SALINI COSTRUTTORI S.P.A.
Respondent: KINGDOM OF MOROCCO
Case Number: 1:2014cv02036
Filed: December 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 99999
Presiding Judge: Tanya S. Chutkan
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 1 Petitioner's petition to confirm arbitration award and 46 Respondent's motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 2/10/2017. (lctsc3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SALINI COSTRUTTORI S.P.A. v. KINGDOM OF MOROCCO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SALINI COSTRUTTORI S.P.A.
Represented By: Scott Michael Abeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KINGDOM OF MOROCCO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?