INTELECT CORPORATION v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP GP et al
Plaintiff: INTELECT CORPORATION
Defendant: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP GP, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS, PCS, LLC, APC REALTY AND EQUIPMENT CO., LLC, NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MID-ATLANTIC, INC. and T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC
Case Number: 1:2015cv00902
Filed: June 11, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Rudolph Contreras
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 5 Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue and granting in part and denying in part 11 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 02/05/2016. (lcrc2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: INTELECT CORPORATION v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP GP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: INTELECT CORPORATION
Represented By: Philip C. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP GP
Represented By: Suzanne N. Boyd
Represented By: Marianne R. Casserly
Represented By: Scott M Jarvis
Represented By: William S. Sugden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS, PCS, LLC
Represented By: Suzanne N. Boyd
Represented By: Marianne R. Casserly
Represented By: Scott M Jarvis
Represented By: William S. Sugden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APC REALTY AND EQUIPMENT CO., LLC
Represented By: Suzanne N. Boyd
Represented By: Marianne R. Casserly
Represented By: Scott M Jarvis
Represented By: William S. Sugden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MID-ATLANTIC, INC.
Represented By: Suzanne N. Boyd
Represented By: Marianne R. Casserly
Represented By: Scott M Jarvis
Represented By: William S. Sugden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC
Represented By: Suzanne N. Boyd
Represented By: Marianne R. Casserly
Represented By: Scott M Jarvis
Represented By: William S. Sugden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?