TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff: SHANCE TAYLOR
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case Number: 1:2017cv00122
Filed: January 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: John D. Bates
Presiding Judge: Deborah A. Robinson
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for plaintiff's 11 Motion for Attorneys' Fees. The plaintiff's 11 Motion for Attorneys' Fees is GRANTED IN PART. See order for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on September 26, 2018. (lcdlf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHANCE TAYLOR
Represented By: Charles Anthony Moran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?