SMITH v. OVERSEAS KOREAN CULTURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
Plaintiff: THERRELL SMITH
Defendant: OVERSEAS KOREAN CULTURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
Case Number: 1:2017cv00598
Filed: April 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Rudolph Contreras
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 28:1602
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 22 Order on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affidavit; and Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 1/2/2018. (lctnm3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. OVERSEAS KOREAN CULTURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THERRELL SMITH
Represented By: Joseph A. McManus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OVERSEAS KOREAN CULTURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
Represented By: Thomas B. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?