LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW v. PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY et al
||LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW
||PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT, OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION, MICHAEL R. PENCE, KRIS W. KOBACH, ANDREW KOSSACK, TIMOTHY R. HORNE and MARCIA L. KELLY
||July 10, 2017
||US District Court for the District of Columbia
||Washington, DC Office
|Nature of Suit:
||Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 28, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's 35 Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's August 30, 2017 Order and for Additional Appropriate Relief, and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's 41 Supplemental Request for Relief in Conjunction with Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Compliance with the Court's August 30, 2017 Order. Defendants shall file a Motion to Dismiss by JULY 30, 2018. Plaintiff shall respond to the Motio n to Dismiss by AUGUST 13, 2018. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be due by AUGUST 20, 2018.See Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on June 28, 2018.(lcckk1) Modified on 6/29/2018 to change document type to opinion(kt).
|July 18, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 7/18/2017. (lcckk1)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?