JEWELL v. BESTBUS
Plaintiff: VASILY JEWELL
Defendant: BESTBUS
Case Number: 1:2018cv00359
Filed: February 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Trevor N. McFadden
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 15:1938
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting Defendant's 6 Motion to Quash, denying Defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss, and granting Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Leave to File. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this Order to amend his complaint and effectuate proper service of process. See attached Memorandum Order for details. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 8/3/2018. (lctnm3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JEWELL v. BESTBUS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BESTBUS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VASILY JEWELL
Represented By: Leonard B. Ference
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?