LOUVIERRE-RAMIREZ v. OSADA
| TIFFANY D LOUVIERRE-RAMIREZ and TIFFANY D. LOUVIERRE-RAMIREZ |
| DR. TATSUHIKO OSADA and TATSUHIKO OSADA |
| 1:2018cv01768 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| James E Boasberg |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Nicole Bell-Norwood, Courtroom Deputy on 9/13/18. (znbn) |
MINUTE ORDER: On July 30, 2018, Defendant Osada removed this action here from D.C. Superior Court. See ECF No. 1. When Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff's largely incomprehensible one-sentence Complaint, see ECF No. 7, the Court ordered Plaintiff to respond by August 29, 2018, or face dismissal. See ECF No. 9. As she has not done so, the Court ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED as conceded per LCvR 7(b), and the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/13/2018. (lcjeb2)
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by TATSUHIKO OSADA re #7 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , #6 Notice (Other) Second Amended. (Morgan, Sherri) |
|
Filing 9
Order advising Plaintiff to respond by August 29, 2018, or Court may deem matter as conceded. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 8/8/18. (lcjeb1)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by TATSUHIKO OSADA re #7 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , #6 Notice (Other) Amended. (Morgan, Sherri) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff to Respond by 8/29/2018. (znbn) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss , by TATSUHIKO OSADA (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Superior Court Documents Docket, #3 Superior Court Documents Notice of Service on Osada)(Morgan, Sherri) Modified on 8/9/2018 (zrdj). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Regarding Service of Complaint by TATSUHIKO OSADA re #1 Notice of Removal, (Morgan, Sherri) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sherri L. Morgan on behalf of TATSUHIKO OSADA (Morgan, Sherri) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (zsb) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Government shall file a Notice with the Court indicating its position on whether service of the Complaint has been accomplished and/or whether it will waive further service and proceed to respond to the Complaint by 8/7/2018. (nbn) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that by August 7, 2018, the Government shall file a Notice with the Court indicating its position on whether service of the Complaint has been accomplished and/or whether it will waive further service and proceed to respond to the Complaint. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 7/31/2018. (lcjeb2)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zsb) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by TATSUHIKO OSADA re #2 Notice (Other) . (Morgan, Sherri) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Substitution of Party by TATSUHIKO OSADA re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Certification)(Morgan, Sherri) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2017 SC3 007050 filed by TATSUHIKO OSADA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Superior Court Documents Exh. A - Complaint, #3 Exh. B- Certification, #4 Superior Court Documents Exh. C - Pl's Mot. to Amend, #5 Superior Court Documents Exh. D - Dismissal of Related Case, #6 Superior Court Documents Exh. E - Return to Sender, #7 Certificate of Service)(Morgan, Sherri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
