GRANT v. APPEALS COUNCIL OFFICE OF DISABILITY ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW
Plaintiff: TOMMYE MALLORY GRANT
Defendant: APPEALS COUNCIL OFFICE OF DISABILITY ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW
Case Number: 1:2018cv01812
Filed: August 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2018 Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 8/1/2018. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (sb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GRANT v. APPEALS COUNCIL OFFICE OF DISABILITY ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APPEALS COUNCIL OFFICE OF DISABILITY ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TOMMYE MALLORY GRANT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?