OLDAKER v. LANKFORD et al
| WILLIAM C OLDAKER and WILLIAM C. OLDAKER |
| V THOMAS LANKFORD, LANKFORD & REED PLLC and V. THOMAS LANKFORD |
| 1:2018cv01889 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Amy Berman Jackson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE by LANKFORD & REED PLLC. LANKFORD & REED PLLC waiver sent on 8/15/2018, answer due 10/14/2018. (Quinn, Dennis) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE by V. THOMAS LANKFORD. V. THOMAS LANKFORD waiver sent on 8/15/2018, answer due 10/14/2018. (Quinn, Dennis) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to V. THOMAS LANKFORD, LANKFORD & REED PLLC. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmd) |
| Filing 3 ERRATA Corrected Caption by WILLIAM C. OLDAKER #1 Complaint filed by WILLIAM C. OLDAKER. (Smith, Mary Lou) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zsb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by WILLIAM C OLDAKER. Case related to Case No. 18-1282. (Smith, Mary Lou) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5635377) filed by WILLIAM C OLDAKER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Smith, Mary Lou) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
