ULLIMAN SCHUTTE CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.
ULLIMAN SCHUTTE CONSTRUCTION, LLC |
Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. |
1:2018cv02019 |
August 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amit P Mehta |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Joshua B. Levy is hereby admitted pro hac vice to appear in this matter. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 10/18/2018. (lcapm1) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Joshua Brook Levy, :Firm- Husch Blackwell, LLP, :Address- 555 East Wells St.. Ste. 1900, Milwaukee, WI 53202. Phone No. - 414-273-2100. Fax No. - 414-223-5000 Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-5744808. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Waagner, Brian) |
Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/16/2018 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 10 before Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zjd) |
Filing 7 ORDER setting an Initial Scheduling Conference for November 16, 2018, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 10 before Judge Amit P. Mehta. See the attached Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 10/12/2018. (lcapm1) |
Filing 6 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. (Waagner, Brian) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #4 Amended Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against ULLIMAN SCHUTTE CONSTRUCTION, LLC by CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC..(Waagner, Brian) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with Jury Demand filed by ULLIMAN SCHUTTE CONSTRUCTION, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Summons Summons)(Kraftson, Daniel) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zsb) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ULLIMAN SCHUTTE CONSTRUCTION, LLC. (Kraftson, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5662051) filed by ULLIMAN SCHUTTE CONSTRUCTION, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons Summons)(Kraftson, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ULLIMAN SCHUTTE CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Joshua Brook Levy |
Represented By: | Brian Paul Waagner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ULLIMAN SCHUTTE CONSTRUCTION, LLC | |
Represented By: | Daniel J. Kraftson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.