FREEDOM WATCH, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. et al
| FREEDOM WATCH, INC. |
| APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC., FACEBOOK INC. and TWITTER, INC. |
| 1:2018cv02030 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by TWITTER, INC. (Willen, Brian) |
| Filing 19 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by FACEBOOK INC. (Allen, Kenneth) |
| Filing 18 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by APPLE INC. (Gottlieb, Michael) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by William A. Isaacson on behalf of APPLE INC. (Isaacson, William) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by James Adam Kraehenbuehl on behalf of APPLE INC. (Kraehenbuehl, James) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian M. Willen on behalf of TWITTER, INC. (Willen, Brian) |
| Filing 14 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by GOOGLE INC. (Schmidtlein, John) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Gottlieb on behalf of APPLE INC. (Gottlieb, Michael) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint and for Entry of Briefing Schedule by GOOGLE INC. (Schmidtlein, John) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Goodman Hentoff on behalf of GOOGLE INC. (Hentoff, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Kannon K. Shanmugam on behalf of GOOGLE INC. (Shanmugam, Kannon) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by John E. Schmidtlein on behalf of GOOGLE INC. (Schmidtlein, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Elizabeth Miller on behalf of FACEBOOK INC. (Miller, Mary) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth Winn Allen on behalf of FACEBOOK INC. (Allen, Kenneth) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig S. Primis on behalf of FACEBOOK INC. (Primis, Craig) |
MINUTE ORDER granting the Defendants' #12 Motion for Extension of Time. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before November 16, 2018. Plaintiff shall oppose any motion to dismiss filed by Defendants on or before December 17, 2018. Defendants may reply to any opposition on or before January 11, 2019. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 10/26/18. (ltnm1)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to ALPHABET INC. (dba GOOGLE INC.) (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent) (tth) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by FREEDOM WATCH, INC..(Klayman, Larry) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to APPLE INC., FACEBOOK INC., GOOGLE INC., TWITTER, INC. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 9/4/18. (lctnm1)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5664678) filed by FREEDOM WATCH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Klayman, Larry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
