TERRY v. ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL

Plaintiff: CHARLES TERRY
Defendant: ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL
Case Number: 1:2018cv02585
Filed: November 9, 2018
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
November 9, 2018 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by CHARLES TERRY. Case related to Case No. 18-cv-1733. (zmd)
November 9, 2018 1 COMPLAINT against ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5785181) filed by CHARLES TERRY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice to Counsel/Party Related Case Form, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Alderman, Leslie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TERRY v. ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES TERRY
Represented By: Leslie David Alderman, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?