CERTAIN LITHOGRAPHY MACHINES AND SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS THEREOF (1) AND (II) et al v. NIKON CORPORATION et al
| NIKON PRECISION INC., NIKON RESEARCH CORPORATION OF AMERICA and NIKON CORPORATION |
| CARL ZEISS SMG GMBH |
| CERTAIN LITHOGRAPHY MACHINES AND SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS THEREOF (1) AND (II) |
| 1:2018mc00163 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion to Take Deposition from Any Consul or Vice Consul of the United States, U.S. Consulate General Osaka. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/6/2018. (zjd)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion to Take Deposition from Any Consul or Vice Consul of the United States, U.S. Embassy Tokyo. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/6/2018. (zjd)
|
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CARL ZEISS SMG GMBH identifying Corporate Parent CARL ZEISS AG for CARL ZEISS SMG GMBH. (jf) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Take Deposition from NIKON CORPORATION, NIKON PRECISION INC., NIKON RESEARCH CORPORATION OF AMERICA by CARL ZEISS SMG GMBH (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(jf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
