ATTENTIVE.AI, INC. v. WHITAKER et al
Plaintiff: ATTENTIVE.AI, INC.
Defendant: KATHY BARAN, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, L. FRANCIS CISSNA and KIRSTJEN NIELSEN
Case Number: 1:2019cv00283
Filed: February 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Tanya S Chutkan
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2019 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. KIRSTJEN NIELSEN served on 2/6/2019 (Labukas, Jonathan)
February 13, 2019 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. L. FRANCIS CISSNA served on 2/6/2019 (Labukas, Jonathan)
February 13, 2019 Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. KATHY BARAN served on 2/6/2018 (Labukas, Jonathan)
February 13, 2019 Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General on 2/7/2019. (Labukas, Jonathan) Modified text to indicate Attorney General on 2/14/2019; wrong event selected (ztd).
February 5, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to KATHY BARAN, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, )
February 5, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KATHY BARAN, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5928235) filed by ATTENTIVE.AI, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons Kathy Baran, #3 Summons Summons L. Francis Cissna, #4 Summons Summons Kirstjen Nielsen, #5 Summons Summons Matthew G. Whitaker, #6 Declaration, #7 Exhibit Exhibit A - H-1B Petition, #8 Exhibit Exhibit B - RFE Response, #9 Exhibit Exhibit C - H-1B Denial)(Labukas, Jonathan)
February 5, 2019 Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zef, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ATTENTIVE.AI, INC. v. WHITAKER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATHY BARAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MATTHEW G. WHITAKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. FRANCIS CISSNA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KIRSTJEN NIELSEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ATTENTIVE.AI, INC.
Represented By: Jonathan P. Labukas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?