DEARING v. W.C.C.F.
| DEWAYNE DEARING |
| W.C.C.F., TRINITY FOOD SERVICE, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 1:2019cv01040 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Receipt on 06/03/2019 of Electronic Transfer. Other Court Number 5:19-cv-00049 sent by Southern District of Mississippi. (zrdj) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred to the USDC for the Southern District of Mississippi, pursuant to the Court Order entered 04/30/2019. Sent to Court via Electronically. (zsb) |
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Southern District of Mississippi. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 5/20/2019. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 04/29/2019. (zsb)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DEWAYNE DEARING (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, TRINITY FOOD SERVICE, W.C.C.F. filed by DEWAYNE DEARING. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 04/09/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
