HAMILTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| DEANDRE LAMONT HAMILTON |
| JOHN DOES, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SENTINEL OFFENDER SERVICES, LLC |
| 1:2019cv01105 |
| April 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY served on 6/26/2019 (Yannone, John) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 4/19/2019. (lcrdm2, )
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY, SENTINEL OFFENDER SERVICES, LLC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zef, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6069815) filed by DeAndre Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Yannone, John) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/19/2019) (zef, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
