REKER v. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS et al
MARY LOU REKER |
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS and CARLA HAYDEN |
1:2019cv01282 |
May 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amy Berman Jackson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS (3) Issued as to LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (zsb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zsb) |
Filing 5 ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign this case randomly to a judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 06/24/2019. (zsb) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against LIBRARY OF CONGRESS with Jury Demand filed by MARY LOU REKER.(zrdj) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. FURTHER ORDERED that, within 30 days from the filing date of this Order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint. (See Order for details). Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 05/16/2019. (zmc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARY LOU REKER. (zef, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CARLA HAYDEN, LIBRARY OF CONGRESS filed by MARY LOU REKER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(zef, ) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 05/02/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zef, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.