PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
| PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY |
| UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE |
| 1:2019cv01325 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER granting nunc pro tunc #6 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended up to and including 6/28/2019. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 7/03/2019. (zad)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE.(Seabrook, April) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (Seabrook, April) |
| Case directly reassigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. Judge Amit P. Mehta is no longer assigned to the case. (rj) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 6/26/2019. (zjd) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Defendant's Responsive Pleading shall be due on or before June 26, 2019. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 06/21/2019. (lcapm3)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (Seabrook, April) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by April Denise Seabrook on behalf of All Defendants (Seabrook, April) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zef, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zef, ) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY (Jenkins, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6108080) filed by PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet cover sheet, #2 Summons AG summons, #3 Summons Agency Summons, #4 Summons USAO summons)(Jenkins, Peter) (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/8/2019) (zef, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE | |
| Represented By: | April Denise Seabrook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY | |
| Represented By: | Peter T. Jenkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
