SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NICK R. SMITH, HRM KING NICODEMUS and NICKI RAY SMITH |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
1:2019cv01365 |
May 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
James E Boasberg |
Prisoner Petition: General (Habeas Corpus) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER DENYING #6 Motion for Reconsideration. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 6/4/2019. (lcjeb1) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Reconsideration re #4 Order, #5 Memorandum & Opinion by NICK R. SMITH (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ztd) |
Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number: 4616098001. (ztd) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION re #4 Order. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 5/13/2019. (lcjeb1) |
Filing 4 ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 5/13/2019. (lcjeb1) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by NICK R. SMITH (ztd) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by NICK R. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztd) |
Filing 1 ENTERED IN ERROR. . . . .COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA filed by NICK R. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztd) Modified on 5/13/2019 (ztd). |
NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: re #1 Complaint was entered in error and refiled said pleading as docket entry no. #2 . (ztd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.