SHEPHARD v. WRAY et al
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD |
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., DICK CHENEY, SHERROD BROWN, JOHN ROBERTS, DONALD TRUMP, DICK DURBIN, BARACK OBAMA, LINDSEY GRAHAM, PATRICK LEAN, U.S. FEDERAL CIA DIRECTOR, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, WILLIAM BARR, GEORGE W. BUSH, JOHN PORTER, WILLIAM CLINTON, M. GARLAND and WILLIAM P. BARR |
1:2019cv01810 |
June 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). This is a final appealable Order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this Order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is not taken in good faith. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 07/02/2019. (zmc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD.(zsb) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 06/11/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.