MEDINA v. UNITED STATES
| OSCAR ALEJANDRO MEDINA and OMAR ALEJANDRO MEDINA |
| UNITED STATES |
| 1:2019cv02487 |
| August 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 09/30/19. (lcrdm3, )
|
|
Filing 4
FOX/NEAL ORDER: Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. #3 , on or before October 14, 2019. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 09/30/19. (lcrdm3, )
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's Response due by 10/14/2019. (kt) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by UNITED STATES (McBride, Patricia) Modified event on 9/27/2019 (znmw). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal (zsb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2019 CA 004642 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by UNITED STATES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(McBride, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
