KENNEDY v. HODGES et al
| EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY |
| VICTOR J. WOLSKI, MARGARET M. SWEENEY, UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS, ERIC G. BRUGGINK and ROBERT H. HODGES |
| 1:2019cv02766 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail.. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 10/7/19. (zmd)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 10/7/19. (zmd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY. (zjd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ERIC G. BRUGGINK, ROBERT H. HODGES, MARGARET M. SWEENEY, UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS, VICTOR J. WOLSKI with Jury Demand filed by EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Summons, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(zjd) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 9/13/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zjd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
