JAMES v. PITTS
WENDY ERICA JAMES |
ANDREW PITTS and ANDREW COLLIER PITTS |
WENDY JAMES |
1:2019cv02843 |
September 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Randolph D Moss |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER: In light of Plaintiff's Stipulation of Dismissal, Dkt. #5 , the Court ORDERS that the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to terminate this case. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 10/11/19. (lcrdm1) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal Preacipe of Dismissal by WENDY ERICA JAMES. (Liss, Marvin) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANDREW COLLIER PITTS served on 10/1/2019, answer due 10/22/2019 (Liss, Marvin) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 9/24/19. (lcrdm1, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to ANDREW COLLIER PITTS. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zeg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zeg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-6392180) filed by WENDY JAMES. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Liss, Marvin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.