BORUSHEVSKYI v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
| ANDRII BORUSHEVSKYI |
| SARAH M. KENDALL, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI |
| 1:2019cv03034 |
| October 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Emmet G Sullivan |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER: The parties are directed to read the attached Standing Order Governing Civil Cases Before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in its entirety upon receipt. The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives in the attached Standing Order. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 10/22/19. (Attachment: Exhibit 1) (mac)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, SARAH M. KENDALL, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. (zmc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, SARAH M. KENDALL, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6441375) filed by ANDRII BORUSHEVSKYI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Kurzban, Ira)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
