PROCTOR v. CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC. et al
CHARNITA PROCTOR |
Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. and CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION |
Capital One, N.A. |
1:2019cv03240 |
October 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/30/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 28A before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (dot) |
MINUTE ORDER: The Court has received Plaintiff's #9 Consent Motion to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference, in which Plaintiff explains that Plaintiff's counsel will be unavailable for the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for December 17, 2019. Plaintiff further indicates that Defendants consent to rescheduling the Initial Scheduling Conference. Accordingly, for good cause and with the parties' consent, this Motion is GRANTED. The December 17, 2019 date for the Initial Scheduling Conference is vacated and the Conference shall be rescheduled for DECEMBER 30, 2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 28A. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on December 9, 2019. (lccck1) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION to Continue Initial Scheduling Conference by CHARNITA PROCTOR (Styles, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/17/2019 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 28A before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 11/18/19. (dot) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC., CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.(Reza, Syed) |
Filing 6 ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 11/6/19. (DM) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer to the Complaint due by 11/14/2019. (dot) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint by CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC., CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reza, Syed) |
MINUTE ORDER: The Court has received Defendants' #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Defendants request an extension of the deadline to respond to the Complaint from November 4, 2019 to November 14, 2019 to allow more time to fully investigate the claims in the Complaint and to consider whether the action can be resolved without further litigation. Defendants indicate that Plaintiff has consented to this extension. Accordingly, with the parties' consent, this Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their response to the Complaint by NOVEMBER 14, 2019. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on November 1, 2019. (lccck1) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (zmc) |
Case assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (zmc) |
Filing 3 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by Capital One Auto Finance, Inc., Capital One, N.A. (Reza, Syed) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case by Capital One Auto Finance, Inc., Capital One, N.A. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Reza, Syed) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of District of Columbia, case number 2019 CA 005893 B Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADCDC-6484577 filed by Capital One, N.A., Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reza, Syed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.