LOTFI v. US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
JAMILA LOTFI |
US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANA, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. CONSULATE, CASABLANCA, MOROCCO, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE and U.S. CONSULATE |
1:2019cv03690 |
December 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rudolph Contreras |
Other Statutory Actions |
8 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Cirino on behalf of All Defendants (Cirino, Paul) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANA, U.S. CONSULATE, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc) |
Case assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zmc) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by JAMILA LOTFI filed by JAMILA LOTFI.(Hacking, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6635829) filed by JAMILA LOTFI. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons)(Hacking, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.